Subject: Re: alternating tags in a list? From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 11:31:15 +0000 |
Sorry, you're quite right. I made the mistake of confusing the reality of the Web development industry with a bit of cosy ivory tower research. Pardon me for being a Web designer and thinking the W3C might be actualy catering to my needs :) In fairness I should have narrowed the scope of my comment and said that if XML/XSL can provide an alternative to 90% of ASP as used for tranforming data into mark-up, I don't see the point in it. In short if XML/XSL doen't provide a better solution than existing solutions why bother? But I guess it could be said the XSL WG isn't chartered to produce a better solution than existing solutions :) Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 12/17/98 12:46:42 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Re: alternating tags in a list? Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > In my mind if XSL can't replace 90% of ASP I > don't see the point in it. The XSL WG isn't chartered to produce a replacement for ASP. It's chartered to produce a stylesheet language for XML. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: alternating tags in a list?, James Clark | Thread | RE: alternating tags in a list?, Didier PH Martin |
Re: alternating tags in a list?, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: XSL FO competition, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |