Re: syntax feedback

["Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx> wrote:

>I wrote:
>> My understanding of Daniel's position - and I may be wrong - is that the
CSS
>> syntax be adopted in more then just the pattern language (witness STTS,
for
>> example).
>
>STTS does use the CSS "pattern" (selector) syntax.
>
>> If it was just the pattern language, it wouldn't have been much of
>> an argument :-)
>
>I don't understand your point, sinc ehtat is exactly what STTS uses;
>unless you are one of those folks who seem to think that CSS selectors
>are limited to a single GI? In which case the advise would be to go read
>the spec.


No, I meant that STTS syntax is very different then XSL syntax (in fact,
from any XML syntax) in more then the just pattern language. It isn't as if
you could replace the XSL pattern language with CSS-like selectors and get
STTS. I didn't mean to imply anything about the capabilities of STTS.

Oren Ben-Kiki.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list