Subject: Re: Why XT doesn't use the DOM From: Tyler Baker <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 10:49:09 -0500 |
\"Pasqualino \\\"Titto\\\" Assini\" wrote: > Now that XSL is going to be a major force I think that DOM should be expanded to > allow XSL processor to be built on top of it. > > Do the DOM folks agree ? As ugly as namespaces currently are, the DOM might as well have support for them. Either that or scrap namespaces altogether. They have been pretty much useless for my needs and everyone else I know using XML to date. Tyler XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Why XT doesn't use the DOM, Gavin Thomas Nicol | Thread | RE: FW: XSL with scripting, Didier PH Martin |
RE: Why XT doesn't use the DOM, Gavin Thomas Nicol | Date | Re: XSL with scripting, Simon St.Laurent |
Month |