Subject: Re: Why XT doesn't use the DOM From: "Don Park" <donpark@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 08:14:59 -0800 |
>> As James pointed out, editability has some cost associated with it but it is >> a plus if scripting language is used with XSL. > >Editability is okay for the OUTPUT but the INPUT had better not be >editable by inline scripts! I disagree. I do see some value in filtering and augmenting input by inline scripts. Also, I do think multiphase XSL processing will be quite common and DOM-based XSL processor are likely to be more efficient at it. However, I don't want to lose hair over this issue until Propecia is as cheap as vitamin. Cheers, Don Park XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Why XT doesn't use the DOM, Tyler Baker | Thread | Personal peeve, keshlam |
Re: Why XT doesn't use the DOM, Tyler Baker | Date | Re: ANN: LotusXSL on IBM's AlphaWor, anette . engel |
Month |