Subject: Re: Questions on the new XSL spec (section 2.6) From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 12:44:15 +0700 |
David Schach wrote: > > Thanks for the explanation of match ancestor. > > > How about id()? Do you support something like foo/id(@ref)? > > > Yes when it is used in a select or test. foo/id(@ref) is interpreted as > id(foo/@ref). I don't think there is a good interpretation when it is used > in a match. It would match an element that's referred to by a foo element's ref attribute. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Questions on the new XSL spec (, David Schach | Thread | Questions on the new XSL spec (sect, Steve Dahl |
RE: Questions on the new XSL spec (, David Schach | Date | Template Rule Conflict Resolution, Paul Spencer |
Month |