Subject: Re: More entity confusion and my opinion on the right way From: Keith Visco <kvisco@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 11:28:21 -0500 |
Paul, What would I do without you? :-) Now I have a question on this, and perhaps I have misunderstood the CDATA section (2.4 of XML rec). 2.4 of the XML rec states... --- The ampersand character (&) and the left angle bracket (<) may appear in their literal form only when used as markup delimiters, or within a comment, a processing instruction, or a CDATA section. ---- since the & can appear in the literal form, shouldn't it remain in the literal form when it is written back out from the result tree? I can understand replacing the standard entities, but an entity not declared should be left alone if it appears in a CDATA section, right? IBM's XML for Java (1.1.4) has this behavior this even when I have the expand entity references flag set to true. Thanks, --Keith certainly Paul Prescod wrote: > > Keith Visco wrote: > > > > If you don't want the XSL processor to expand an entity reference, > > or you don't want to look up "magic numbers" there is an alternative. > > This is not an alternative. The output of this: > > > <![CDATA[ ]]> > > will be: > > &nbsp; > > That's why this thread arises so often and is always so long. > > Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself > http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco > > "You have the wrong number." > "Eh? Isn't that the Odeon?" > "No, this is the Great Theater of Life. Admission is free, but the > taxation is mortal. You come when you can, and leave when you must. The > show is continuous. Good-night." -- Robertson Davies, "The Cunning Man" > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: More entity confusion and my op, James Clark | Thread | Re: More entity confusion and my op, David Carlisle |
RE: MSXML on NT4 Server - HELP, Guy_Murphy | Date | Re: More entity confusion and my op, Guy_Murphy |
Month |