Subject: An XML Namespaces Alternative... From: keshlam@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 11:23:02 -0500 |
I need to spend more time reading this, and the reply probably belongs in a Namespace-specific or SAX-specific discussion, but one quick nitpick: >SAX for example is not namespace aware That should read "SAX 1.0 is not namespace aware". There is always the option of releasing a SAX 1.1 to fix that. That's why specs carry version numbers... and why some specs include a call that reports the version number currently implemented. (Sax needs an update anyway, IMO, to add an event for comments. DOM is a good random-access representation of XML, and SAX is a good streaming representation. Both can stand further polishing.) ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research Unless stated otherwise, all opinions are solely those of the author. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
An XML Namespaces Alternative..., Tyler Baker | Thread | Re: An XML Namespaces Alternative.., Tyler Baker |
How I can get an ancestor ...., Éric Riblair | Date | Understanding character handling, keshlam |
Month |