Subject: Re: Standard API to XSL processors From: Tyler Baker <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 21:37:12 -0500 |
Paul Prescod wrote: > Tyler Baker wrote: > > > > You can write the result tree to a stream or else to a random access structure. > > > > You don't need SAX to write things out to a stream, > > If you don't write things out through SAX, then how can you write a > standard-API-based post-processor without reparsing the text? The result tree would simply be represented by a DOM Document. This works for XML -> XML transformations but not for other things. The idea is that the XSL Processor would be responsible for constructing this DOM Document. You could of course do things the way you mentioned, but it would likely add a little bit more overhead than constructing the DOM Document directly. Tyler XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Standard API to XSL processors, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: Standard API to XSL processors, Paul Prescod |
Re: Standard API to XSL processors, James Clark | Date | Re: dl/dt/dd matching, James Clark |
Month |