Subject: RE: About the style processing instruction From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 17:31:22 -0500 |
Hi Chris, <YourComment> But what if I have some print and some on-line rules in the same stylesheet? Surely not unthinkable, since most properties will be the same for both media. This is why CSS provides the @media rules *in* the stylesheet, and why XSL has an open issue about how best to provide this functionality. <Reply> Yes right, the CSS2 specs include a provision name @media which is a good idea but not applicable to XML nor SGML then it can not be as is with XSL (XML based) and DSSSL (SGML based). However a similar provision should be part of either DSSSL or XSL. The following thread is a reflexion about it with the other list member fellow. Matthieu already made a good suggestion on this. Of course the @media instruction is surely doemthing to look at but also be adapted to both XSL and DSSSL. No? <Your Comment> Don't re-invent the wheel. <Reply> Are you suggesting here that only W3 can specify things and us let only with implementation? Is it a one way dialogue (if I can call that dialogue) with institutions like we got 1000 years ago (or not so long ago)? I hope not. Regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: About the style processing inst, Chris Maden | Thread | Re: About the style processing inst, Chris Maden |
RE: Apologies, XML to HTML conversi, Didier PH Martin | Date | RE: XSL dependency to SGML apps, Didier PH Martin |
Month |