Subject: Fw: Formal parameters for stylesheets From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 09:56:48 +0200 |
Jason Diamond <sendangels@xxxxxxx> wrote: >A processor could actually support parameters without changing the spec. If a >user did something like this on the command line: > >xt -Dfoo=bar test.xml test.xsl > >The processor could interpret that as inserting a: > ><xsl:constant name="foo" value="bar"/> > >into the stylesheet. Maybe a {parameter(foo)} function would actually help so >that users don't confuse the two concepts, though. If this is done, not only should that be "{parameter(foo)}", but there should be an explicit declaration: <xsl:parameter name="foo" default="..."/> Somewhere in the stylesheet. Otherwise all hell would break loose when combining stylesheets, writing GUI for XSL processors, doing DTD verifications... Share & Enjoy, Oren Ben-Kiki XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Formal parameters for styleshee, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: Fw: Formal parameters for style, Jason Diamond |
Re: Formal parameters for styleshee, Jason Diamond | Date | Expanding QNames in ElementExpressi, Tyler Baker |
Month |