Subject: Re: Venting From: "Rick Ross" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 06:05:16 -0500 |
Again, Don is right on the mark here. To a prospective customer the words "100% support of the standard" are a lot different than "100% support of the relevant parts of the standard". No businessperson has the luxury of requiring customers to be logical and analytical - in the current situation we'll often end up with "close, but no cigar!" The quick consensus that appears to be forming about the value of splitting these parts of XSL into two pieces should be an indicator here - there is obviously good reason to give it serious consideration, at the very least. Rick Ross Activated Intelligence Don Park wrote: > > James, > > I have had the misfortune of being an entrepreneur as well as a developer > for the past 18 years which means I had to worry about the color of the box > as much as what goes into it. Based on my experience, it matters a great > deal whether one say "our product supports XSL fully" or "our product > supports half of XSL". I will bet you my wallet that it does [note that I > did not bet the content <g>]. > > Best, > > Don Park > Docuverse XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Venting, Don Park | Thread | Re: Venting, Guy_Murphy |
Re: Venting, James Clark | Date | Add my own Flow Objects, parul agarwal |
Month |