Subject: Fw: Splitting XSL From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 10:41:26 +0200 |
Didier PH Martin <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Hi Paul, > ><Document Extract> >Due to the current organization of XSL there are many "XSL >implementations" that have nothing to do with formatting. Currently there >is nothing the W3C can do to discourage these "half-implementations" >without also discouraging the use of the transformation language as a >basis for electronic commerce and data interchange. Not only has the W3C >not discouraged these half implementations, one of them is by an editor >of the XSL specification and others are by W3C members! ><DocumentExtract> > ><Reply> >Many thanks Paul. I agree with the document as is except maybe that last >sentence of the extract above, which, even if true, may be a little bit - >how can I say - a bit abrasive. Otherwise, I agree with the document and you >can put my signature at the bottom of it. ></Reply> My feelings exactly. You may add my signature as well. Share & Enjoy, Oren Ben-Kiki XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Splitting XSL, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: Splitting XSL, Guy_Murphy |
re: Defeating the MS patent on styl, John Markor | Date | parent attribute? aaargh, Mattias Konradsson |
Month |