Subject: Re: Accessing XSL context - Was: RE: Question From: uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 20:45:01 -0700 |
> Agreed. It's been my own experience that link-rich documents are > often the product of automated, database driven processes. If they are > created by hand there has to be an almost religious devotion to the job to > do right and completely. In some cases the devotion is actually religious - > the Jewish legal/religious corpus of the last 2000 years, from the Talmud > through the Shulchan Aruch and on to today's CD-ROMs, was linked by hand. > Several commentaries consist solely of out of line links. So where do you place _Finnegans Wake_ in this dictum? Was it a religious fervor that led to that document? Couldn't resist. -- Uche Ogbuji FourThought LLC, IT Consultants uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (970)481-0805 Software engineering, project management, Intranets and Extranets http://FourThought.com http://OpenTechnology.org XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Accessing XSL context - Was: RE, Vun Kannon, David | Thread | About Microsoft Patent, Didier PH Martin |
Re: SGML output from XSL?, Paul Prescod | Date | RE: SGML output from XSL?, Borden, Jonathan |
Month |