Subject: Time taken to impliment FOs?.... From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 12:07:23 +0000 |
Hi. My participation in the "Venting" thread is getting rather circular, so I thought I'd step sideways. One of the recuring themes that I've found in this thread is that FOs will probably be a long way off being implimented. I wanted to question this assumption to see how true it might be, but I'm aware that there are others on the list, hopefuly some people involved with Gecko, that might be better able to comment on this. I would draw to attention, the radical change MS made between IE3 and 4, and the *huge* sweeping changes it made to its DOM, and to a leaser extent it's rapid integration of XML and relatd technology in IE5. With NS, what was looking like a slow moving progress quickly got turned around when it turned open source, resulting in the quick emergence of Gecko. So the question is, would it take so very long for NS and MS to impliment FOs? It XSL became a Rec in August, this time next year might we be seeing the betas of IE & NN 6 with FOs implimented? If the answer is that the browser manufacurer can move quickly to impliment new technology into their browsers, then whether they do so or not becomes less a matter of ability, and more a consideration of intent and will to allocate development resource amidst competing product requirements. If this is the case do we wish to weaken the insentive for their inclusion of FO support into their browsers by weakening the position of FOs within the XSL Rec? Cheers Guy XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XML/XSL parsers, Borden, Jonathan | Thread | RE: Time taken to impliment FOs?..., Didier PH Martin |
XML/XSL parsers, Sargeant, Richard (G | Date | Re: The Peace Process: DOM and name, Tyler Baker |
Month |