Subject: RE: CSS and XSL From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@xxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 15:35:36 -0500 |
Hi Didier, > > Kind of like [ Netscapisms snipped ] > > except new and improved, because it's now XML? > I like it! And you know, is is more economical for an interpreter > implementer because now, only a XML parser is required. Also, an other gain > is on memory economy (from the human point of view - just use XML rules). > This also, has other more structural advantages like defining objects and > property sets with the same syntax (and reduce the schizoid tendencies of > actual HTML+CSS). Yes, I like it! My rhetorical question was sort of tongue-in-cheek. :) There were good reasons for the "schizoid" nature of *ML+CSS. I question whether reversion to an "improved", well-formed Tag Soup is progress. /Jelks XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: CSS and XSL, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: CSS and XSL, Didier PH Martin |
RE: CSS and XSL, Didier PH Martin | Date | Re: CSS and XSL, Don Park |
Month |