Subject: RE: Complex XSL Application (I think) From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 09:52:35 +0000 |
Hi. You might well be right, but lets give XSL a chance on this one an reserve judgement until the language gets out the door, eh? And generating VRML with XSL does sound like a styling process if one regards VRML as a formatting, rather than just simple preprocessing. Have you got any examples of work available publically on the Net? I wouldn't mind a gander at what you're doing. It's out of my field, but it would be nice to see how other developers are addressing their formatting needs (one can often pick up new techniques from looking at those of other trades). Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 02/26/99 01:06:06 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: RE: Complex XSL Application (I think) NO matter their origin, my opinion is that market and common sense will drive XSL to evolve as a standard general purpose XML preprocessor. In fact we are working on VRML generation straight from XSL rules. any else are working on that? [SNIP] XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Complex XSL Application (I thin, Mark Birbeck | Thread | Re: Complex XSL Application (I thin, Steven Livingstone |
Re: problem!! - Built-in template R, Jayadeva Babu Gali | Date | entities in XML/XSL, Richtner, Fredrik |
Month |