Subject: XT and HTML conversion From: "Richard Lander" <rlander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 14:17:30 -0500 |
Hello, I'm a little confused about XT. I was under the impression that XT converted XML docs to an XMLized HTML, with an XML declaration and empty-element syntax. I thought it was pretty neat that legacy browsers would still read the HTML. As I've since found by actually looking at XT's output, XT produces typical HTML. I take it that I'm using XT correctly and that it is supposed to output non-XML HTML. I'm not trying to deprecate XT, as I think it is a great tool, particularly at its price. I am curious about why it converts to an SGML DTD, instead of XML. Will this use of XT change at some point? Have I missed a critical piece of information? Is it possible to use XT without having it insert the HTML doctype? I used the following XSL, but I found SGML empty-element syntax in the output. Is it possible to force XML empty-element syntax? <xsl:template match="GRAPHIC"> <DIV> <IMG SRC="{@url}"/> </DIV> </xsl:template> Thanks, Richard. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
wrapping elements, Alan Pagliere | Thread | Re: XT and HTML conversion, Chris Maden |
RE: [none] (Wendy's question), Mike Dierken | Date | Re: XT and HTML conversion, Chris Maden |
Month |