Re: Complex XSL Application (I think)

Subject: Re: Complex XSL Application (I think)
From: Craig <craigh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 02:10:00 -0500
There are already existing applications that do similar work, at least I know of
one application that can definitely performsimilar operations.  Acting as a
front end to something like SQL Server to set and store meta-information for
each file introduced to the application.  Searches are performed on the docs
quickly.  And, using asp pages and applying stylesheets using numerous methods,
such as MSXML, the info can be shown to the user painlessly.

Craig H.

Steven Livingstone wrote:

> A shot in the dark here, but everyone else has contributed !!
>
> It may take a bit of work, but whay not use either Index Server or Site
> Server to search you documents (probably do it more effectively than your
> average search engine) and then use XML/XSL to display these docs.
>
> I'd love to say that you could actually parse the documents by developing a
> customised template for IS or SS, but I have not done this.
>
> [ Can you do this ????
> IE. Instead of working on a document via the META headers in SS, can you use
> customised XML/XSL templates to do a proper search??]
>
> Seems to *combine* the best of bother sensible technologies to me.
>
> Steven
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx <Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, February 26, 1999 10:53 AM
> Subject: RE: Complex XSL Application (I think)
>
> >Hi.
> >
> >You might well be right, but lets give XSL a chance on this one an reserve
> >judgement until the language gets out the door, eh?
> >
> >And generating VRML with XSL does sound like a styling process if one
> >regards VRML as a formatting, rather than just simple preprocessing.
> >
> >Have you got any examples of work available publically on the Net? I
> >wouldn't mind a gander at what you're doing. It's out of my field, but it
> >would be nice to see how other developers are addressing their formatting
> >needs (one can often pick up new techniques from looking at those of other
> >trades).
> >
> >Cheers
> >     Guy.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 02/26/99 01:06:06 AM
> >
> >To:   xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >cc:    (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID)
> >Subject:  RE: Complex XSL Application (I think)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >NO matter their origin, my opinion is that market and common sense will
> >drive XSL to evolve as a standard general purpose XML preprocessor.
> >In fact we are working on VRML generation straight from XSL rules.
> >any else are working on that?
> >[SNIP]
> >
> >
> >
> > XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread