Subject: Re: W3C-transformation language petition From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 10:40:00 +0000 |
Hi Oren. I can say with a reasonable degree of surety that the W3C *does* take into account debate and when present consensus among the development communities discourse... things like this list. Whether we end up with the "windows" solution of CSS is not a done-deal yet. Cheers up Oren, there's hope yet :) Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 03/07/99 06:31:04 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: W3C-transformation language petition [SNIP] I didn't say I _liked_ the fact that the W3C has delegated the choice to the market. A "windows" typeof solution is all too probable; in fact I feel the most likely outcome would be adoption of CSS using the current syntax, flaws and all, which as I've said I believe to be the worst of all possible worlds. [SNIP] XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: W3C-transformation language pet, Guy_Murphy | Thread | Re: W3C-transformation language pet, Jonathan Borden |
Re: W3C-transformation language pet, Guy_Murphy | Date | 2 level sorting, 6tk2 |
Month |