Fw: XSL-T, XTL.... or XQL?

Subject: Fw: XSL-T, XTL.... or XQL?
From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:55:00 +0200
Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>Hi Oren.
>When you say XSL is a subset of XQL I assume you are neatly snipping away
>the XSL FOs... they aren't gone quite yet... so XSL is not a subset of XQL.

I stand corrected. XTL, then.

>But I'll play along as I know the valid point you where making :)
>You do however raise an interesting issue though.... do we want to lock XSL
>into the relationship you describe... being a subset of XQL?

I'd rather see it as locking XQL to be a superset of XSL, instead. I
strongly believe that this should be a requirement of any proposed XQL

Have fun,

    Oren Ben-Kiki

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread