Subject: Re: XSL as a better XPointer was RE: The Cathedral and the Bizarre (was: do you use pi's?) From: Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 05:13:19 +0200 |
Jonathan Borden wrote: > > > > > That is correct. More correctly, it locates the element that contains > > verse 12. If I were to locate the entire quote I'd have to write > > > > nt.xml#root().descendant(21,chapter).span(child(12,v),child(13,v)) > Or in XSL patterns: > > //chapter[21]/v[12] > > XSL patterns are a better XPointer (less weight more filling...) Ok, so now make it do the span (verse 12 *and* verse 13) and for an encore, make it select "better Xpointer (less weight" in <foo>XSL patterns are a better XPointer <reason>(less weight more filling...)</reason></foo> -- Chris XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSL as a better XPointer was RE, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: XSL as a better XPointer was RE, Jonathan Borden |
testing xsl:contents?, Mark D. Anderson | Date | RE: XSL as a better XPointer was RE, Jonathan Borden |
Month |