Subject: Re: hiding some of the source From: Matthew MacKenzie <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 17:43:59 -0300 |
John, Thanks, I will try that. I am glad to hear it works with XT though, because I will be using XT soon. Matt "John E. Simpson" wrote: <*snip*> > > Matt, I'm the one that asked about suppressing source-tree elements before. > Since then, I've found that one thing that works is to establish empty > template rules (i.e., containing only the pattern and no template) for the > content you want to suppress. Using your above example, something like this: > > <xsl:template match="XSLCONTROL"> > </xsl:template> > > <xsl:template match="PRODUCT"> > <xsl:apply-templates/> <!-- other template stuff, if any --> > </xsl:template> > > The absence of a template for XSLCONTROL works to suppress it, and all its > descendants, while the presence of a template for PRODUCT copies the > contents of the PRODUCT element (and its descendants) to the result. > > Btw, I'm using XT as an XSL processor. I don't know if IE5 behaves the same > way. > > ========================================================== > John E. Simpson | The secret of eternal youth > simpson@xxxxxxxxxxx | is arrested development. > http://www.flixml.org | -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: hiding some of the source, John E. Simpson | Thread | Re: XSL as a better XPointer was RE, Paul Prescod |
Re: hiding some of the source, John E. Simpson | Date | Re: XSL as a better XPointer was RE, Paul Prescod |
Month |