|
Subject: Re: XSL as a better XPointer From: James Tauber <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 14:45:37 +0800 |
> Let me jump in to point out that there are many conceptual similarities > between XSL patterns and XPointer. Also, the sky is blue. :-) Also, it may be of interest to people reading this thread to have a look at the archives. There was a discussion between Paul Prescod and I on this topic, just after the first WD came out. See in particular my posts: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/archive/msg00632.html http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/archive/msg00647.html http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/archive/msg00656.html http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/archive/msg00699.html http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/archive/msg00748.html James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: XSL as a better XPointer, Didier PH Martin | Thread | Re: XSL as a better XPointer, Chris Lilley |
| RE: XSL as a better XPointer was RE, Jonathan Borden | Date | Re: The Cathedral and the Bizarre (, Guy_Murphy |
| Month |