Subject: Re: New XT release From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 16:12:14 +0100 |
Hi. We sort of got a heads-up that this was comming the other day in the middle of a thread discussing just this move. I realise that others have a different view, but my limited understanding of the issues so far leads me to think of it as a "good thing". Essentialy both expressions are saying "that/those bit(s) there". Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 04/21/99 03:42:39 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Re: New XT release [SNIP] There is another bit of surprise within the XSLT spec itself. "The XSL WG and the XML Linking WG have agreed to unify XSLT expressions and XPointers [XPointer]. A common core semantic model for querying has been agreed upon, and this draft follows this model (see [6.1 Location Paths]). However, further changes particularily in the syntax will probably be necessary." Don XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: New XT release, John E. Simpson | Thread | Re: New XT release, Guy_Murphy |
Mistake...., Guy_Murphy | Date | Re: About XSLT, Richard Lander |
Month |