Subject: Re: Formatting Objects considered harmful From: Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 22:29:19 -0500 |
James Clark wrote: > > I dont understand this debate at all. What is the difference in > harmfulness between I agree that they are equally abusable. I do, however, understand Hakon's point that if you want to make your rendition accessible to the sight impaired, HTML makes it easier than FOs do (as they are currently constituted). If it is easier to do, more people will do it. -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco "The Excursion [Sport Utility Vehicle] is so large that it will come equipped with adjustable pedals to fit smaller drivers and sensor devices that warn the driver when he or she is about to back into a Toyota or some other object." -- Dallas Morning News XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Understanding named templates a, James Clark | Thread | Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Håkon Wium Lie |
Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Ian Hickson | Date | Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Paul Prescod |
Month |