Subject: Whither linking From: Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 12:37:22 -0500 |
http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xslt says: > This draft is intended to be "feature complete". The Working Group > plans to use future drafts to stabilize the current functionality; it > does not intend to add any new functionality in version 1.0." Does this mean that XSL version 1.0 will not have any mechanism for working on the anchors of links identified by XLinks. If so, the two W3C style languages seem to be taking opposite approaches to linking: * CSS says that if you have a private (non-XLink) linking convention then you cannot render the link at all, * XSL provides enough facilities for you to implement your own linking convention but it cannot have links as powerful as those provided by XLink. -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco Company spokeswoman Lana Simon stressed that Interactive Yoda is not a Furby. Well, not exactly. "This is an interactive toy that utilizes Furby technology," Simon said. "It will react to its surroundings and will talk." - http://www.wired.com/news/news/culture/story/19222.html XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: HTML is a formatting/UI languag, Oren Ben-Kiki | Thread | Re: Whither linking, James Clark |
Re: xlxp-dev: XSL and editing tools, Paul Prescod | Date | Re: Formatting Objects considered h, James Clark |
Month |