Subject: RE: Transformation + FOs makes abuse easy From: Miles Sabin <msabin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 18:41:28 +0100 |
Simon St.Laurent wrote, > As a result, the 'meaningful Web' project that was the > driving force (at least in public) for the creation of > XML is at risk. Server-side transformation from > semantically rich private vocabularies to presentation- > oriented public vocabularies may leave the Web exactly > where it was before - interesting to read, but not very > useful. Silly question, but (modulo the invention of a few new mime types), wouldn't the distinction between, Accept: text/xml, text/xsl and, Accept: text/xfo resolve this issue? Ie. if you're happy to recieve a presentation-oriented server-side processed document you use the latter. If you want it undigested, you use the former. Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin Cromwell Media Internet Systems Architect 5/6 Glenthorne Mews +44 (0)181 410 2230 London, W6 0LJ msabin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx England XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Transformation + FOs makes abus, Guy_Murphy | Thread | Re: Transformation + FOs makes abus, Jonathan Borden |
Re: Transformation + FOs makes abus, Guy_Murphy | Date | Re: Transformation + FOs makes abus, Jonathan Borden |
Month |