Subject: Re: <xsl:script> and <xsl:eval> From: Steve Dahl <sdahl@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 15:52:10 -0400 |
Duane Nickull wrote: > G'day all: > > I was going to post this as a reply to a previous thread but decided > that it probably merits it's own discussion. > > We have been working almost exclusively on using the MS-XSL included in > IE 5.0 and have found both <xsl:script> and <xsl:eval> to be *VERY* > useful in the ability to manipulate data. There are several specific > problems which they seem ideally suited to handle. > > Becuase it's not part of the official draft and the xsl draft has been > labeled "feature complete", I am personally a bit leary of hedging too > far into the use of these tags until some further clarification is > taken. > ... > > Comments? > > Duane Nickull What is it that <xsl:script> amd <xsl:eval> do, that <xsl:functions> (Section 6.4.2) and extension functions (Section 6.2.7) don't do, or don't do well? -- - Steve Dahl sdahl@xxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
<xsl:script> and <xsl:eval>, Duane Nickull | Thread | Re: <xsl:script> and <xsl:eval>, Duane Nickull |
<xsl:script> and <xsl:eval>, Duane Nickull | Date | RE: Language is not markup and mark, Didier PH Martin |
Month |