Re: Language is not markup and markup is not language.

["Scott S. Lawton" <ssl@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Rick Geimer typed:

>It's a little late now as far as XSL is concerned, but I sometimes wonder
>if it
>would have been possible to simply take an existing language and massage it
>into XML syntax. This could have accomplished the ease of processing goals you
>mentioned above, allowed for greater flexibility, and helped speed adoption.
>
>Just a thought. Is there still room in that bunker?

Perhaps for a third-party solution.  I also think an existing language
(leveraging, as someone else noted, DOM support) could be much easier; I
personally find XSL to be quite complicated (based on deploying one
real-world application).

cheers,

-- SSL, PreFab Software <http://www.prefab.com/>



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list