Subject: Re: Language is not markup and markup is not language. From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 08:38:59 +0100 |
Hi Paul. You're now officialy my role-model and hero. I want to be like you when I grow up. I understand now why you're quoted so widely :) Seriously. Thanks heaps for taking the time to outline that, I'll follow up on the references this week-end. As for the arguement for excluding the <xsl:script>... why the hell didn't you say so? I thought you where just being a flaky old consultant, who wanted to spoil the fun of Web designers (guess that makes me a flaky Web designer). I'm really not sure on the issue now. I was *heavily* in favour of the <xsl:script> but I *think* I understand enough of your point to see what we might loose along the way. I'll have to rethink my views on this. And to top it all off you go and throw in a link to an anarchy and software paper in the sig. ...I still resent you for lobbying for the splitting of XSL though :P ... Anyhow, cheers for the pointers. Guy. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Language is not markup and mark, Paul Prescod | Thread | Test for the existence of attribute, Sharmila Pandith |
Re: Language is not markup and mark, Paul Prescod | Date | Re: Bogus Patent?, Guy_Murphy |
Month |