Subject: Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:script... From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 18:30:57 +0100 (BST) |
> I've already found it necessary to pre-process my XML so that it makes good XSL > food, Is it possible to say the kind of pre-processing that you found necessary, so that people can think about possible XSL extensions (Short of allowing arbitrary calls to alternative languages) that would solve the problem? David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:s, Rick Geimer | Thread | Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:s, Rick Geimer |
Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:s, Duane Nickull | Date | Re: [Fwd: Re: Language is not marku, David LeBlanc |
Month |