Subject: RE: XSL processor speed ? From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 08:42:00 -0400 |
HI Sebastian, <Comment> So long I've tried two of XSL processor available : XT and XSL:P. Their usage and implementation are different so are their speed in processing XML+XSL documents. Indeed XSL:P, while easier and more flexible ( to my opinion) does need DOM tree for both XML and XSL document before, wich MUST give overhead. On the other hand, XT does not need DOM interface and process document right aways, making it really faster to process the result document. My question is now : Is there benchmark for XSL Processor on the same idea we found in XML-DEV list for XML parser ? </Comment> <reply> Up to my knowledge, I never saw one but would be interested to see one :-) About your comment on XSL processors. Did you meant that XSL:P build a DOM tree for both XSL and XML but that XT only for XML. XT should at least build a DOM tree (or a grove) to get access to the documents elements (in case of a query inside a template). Then, the difference would be that there is, in one case, two DOM built and in the other one only one. </reply> regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
XSL processor speed ?, Sebastien Sahuc | Thread | XLink: behavior must go!, Paul Prescod |
Re: <xsl-script>, Steve Ball | Date | size?, Larry Fitzpatrick |
Month |