Subject: Re: <xsl-script> From: Marcus Carr <mrc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 10:45:22 +1000 |
Paul Prescod wrote: > That's probably true. And Omnimark does not yet match the full > functionality of XSL. They use a completely different model and have > completely different strengths and goals. I realise that it's off-track, but I'd be interested if you would outline a couple of these differences. They don't jump up and grab me, though I'm admittedly not as fluent in XSL as I would like to be. -- Regards, Marcus Carr email: mrc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ___________________________________________________________________ Allette Systems (Australia) www: http://www.allette.com.au ___________________________________________________________________ "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: <xsl-script>, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: <xsl-script>, Paul Prescod |
XSLT draft interpretation question:, Dieter Maurer | Date | Re: XSLT draft interpretation quest, James Clark |
Month |