RE: XSL performance problem

[Sebastien Sahuc <ssahuc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul prescod wrote:
> Plus, we can't tell from your message how much of the time you are
> complaining about is startup time. I hear you saying that you are
> processing 100kb in one second. If that includes JVM startup 
> time, XT/XP
> startup time, and so forth then that sounds pretty good to me!

Well, first thank for your reply, i really appreciate. 

Second, I made benchmark with Servlet using Apache + JServ, meaning
that at the HTTP request, the servlet is doing the very following
tasks :
* Create a new XSLProcessor object;
* Process the xml document (which was already in memory at servlet
init);
* Write the outputstream.

All overhead du to JVM starting, IO processing are done in advance,
that's why I'm considering the result a little unhappy.
But I do understand that none of the processor I used was not
optimized, so now I'm wondering how much gain can we expect for
optimized one ?

Thak for any reply.

Sebastien Sahuc
ssahuc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

only processing the xml document (already read in ;e;ory at servlet
initialisation) the only 


> 
> -- 
>  Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only
himself
>  http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco
> 
> The dress code in Las Cruces New Mexico has been tightened 
> [to] target 
> Gothic clothing, such as dark trench coats. "It is not a witch hunt"
> Superintendent Jesse L. Gozales said. "It is for the safety 
> of the kids
> in our schools."  - Associated Press, May 16 1999
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:
http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list