Subject: Re: Please help with XSL proselytizing From: "Guy Murphy" <guy-murphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 07:42:24 +0100 |
Hi David. I'll use DSSSL or write my own XSL parser, and use them on the server. Personaly I point blank refuse to go back to the days of over bloated script applications. I also refuse to to be press ganged by browser vendors marketing in public forums. If an MS rep declared war on DOM in a public forum I'd be enclined to tell them to **** off. I see no reason to treat DocZilla any differently :) Mozilla doesn't want XSL but is happy enough with XUL. Somebody mention lack of focus? Cheers Guy ----- Original Message ----- [SNIP] > > But there is a difference here. XSL will presumably be going to a vote > of W3C to become a recommendation. What happens if these `xxx is harmful' > threads result in a no vote? > > David > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Please help with XSL proselytiz, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: Please help with XSL proselytiz, Heikki Toivonen |
format and initial-page-number attr, Elliotte Rusty Harol | Date | Re: SAX2 and XSLT processors, Oren Ben-Kiki |
Month |