Subject: Re: ISO-8859-1 From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 09:02:30 -0400 |
At 11:56 AM 5/27/1999 +0200, Bovone Stefano wrote: >If I have a XML document like this: > ><?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> >.... ><text>Perché non funziona?</text> >.... > >and I process it using a XSL formatter, why in the output is the character >"é" converted in ‚ ? > >How could I do to have at the output of the process XML + XSL ---> XML >again the character "é" instead of ‚ ? It depends not only on the encoding declaration, but also on the namespace of the result tree and what tool you're using to generate the result tree. For instance, I think James Clark's xt makes automatic conversions like this whenever you use it to transform XML into [X]HTML, i.e. use the [X]HTML namespace for the result tree. This actually makes sense for that namespace. I don't know, but would assume (hope?) that if you're using some other namespace for the result tree, one which xt doesn't know about, it would pass the é through unchanged. If you're using some other transforming agent, like Microsoft's, perhaps they're using the same kind of "intelligent" guesswork (just too intelligent for its own good! :). ============================================================= John E. Simpson | It's no disgrace t'be poor, simpson@xxxxxxxxxxx | but it might as well be. | -- "Kin" Hubbard XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
ISO-8859-1, Bovone Stefano | Thread | Is it possible to declare entities , Kent Fitch |
ISO-8859-1, Bovone Stefano | Date | RE: ISO-8859-1, Bovone Stefano |
Month |