Subject: Re: Is it possible to declare entities without a DTD From: "Kent Fitch" <kent.fitch@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 13:52:47 +1000 |
Thanks for the suggestions - I found that with the Microsoft XML parser I could process Lee's XML (after adding a ? to the close of the tag on the first line...) as long as I set the validateOnParse property of the Microsoft XMLDOMDOcument object to 'false' - by default it is 'true' and complained that the document without the complete DTD was not valid (although it is 'well formed') Kent Fitch Ph: +61 2 6276 6711 ITS CSIRO Canberra Australia kent.fitch@xxxxxxxxxxxx Liam R. E. Quin <liamquin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 1999, John E. Simpson wrote: > > There's really (yet) no way to define an entity without a DTD > > <?xml version="1.0"> > <!DOCTYPE sock [ > <!ENTITY hole "a large and ragged tear about the left heel"> > ]> > <sock>&hole;</sock> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Is it possible to declare entit, Liam R. E. Quin | Thread | Re: Is it possible to declare entit, John E. Simpson |
Re: Is it possible to declare entit, Liam R. E. Quin | Date | Re: Is it possible to declare entit, John E. Simpson |
Month |