Subject: RE: <xsl-script> From: James Robertson <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 18:06:03 +1000 |
At 16:38 28/05/1999 , Linda van den Brink wrote: | Free for non-commercial (educational & home) use, I understood... Nope. The language itself it totally free, under all situations. Like Perl, you can develop programs using only the language, and a text editor. (And yes, it is designed to compete head-to-head with Perl, and I guess XSL.) What Omnimark are selling now is an IDE, which makes development a bit easier. But it's certainly not necessary for actual development. (I'm not going to start using it in the immediate future: I like text editors.) It's the IDE which is free for non-commercial use, but otherwise costs. | I wonder how people will evaluate this cost/benefit analysis now that the | full version of OmniMark is free? | | Rick Geimer | National Semiconductor | rick.geimer@xxxxxxx Cheers, J XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: <xsl-script>, Linda van den Brink | Thread | OO and scripting, Paul Prescod |
RE: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Heikki Toivonen | Date | RE: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Miles Sabin |
Month |