Subject: Re: Leventhal's challenge misses the point From: "Guy Murphy" <guy-murphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 14:22:43 +0100 |
Hi Heikii Are you suggesting then that the Web is safer if we mandate DOM+ECMAScript with CSS as the standard means for styling XML? My personal concern for the safety of the Web is the DOM+ECMAScript part. I personally am suprised and concernced at the thought that a browser vendor feels that mandating a scripting language as an adjunct to a styling language for styling is best for the Web. Cheers Guy. > > Not personally, he feels the Web is threatened. > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Leventhal's challenge misses th, James Clark | Thread | RE: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Miles Sabin |
Re: XSL for non-programmers, Dieter Maurer | Date | Re: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Guy Murphy |
Month |