Subject: RE: Unicode and XSL (was substring()) From: shalperin@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Shalperin) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 13:35:49 -0700 |
> From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, June 06, 1999 11:28 AM > > I basically agree with this. Counting characters by counting the the > 16-bit quantities that encode characters in UTF-16 makes about as much > sense as counting characters by counting the 8-bit quantities that > encode characters in UTF-8 (which would mean for example that a dollar > counts as one character, and a pound sterling sign counts as 2 > charcaters). The counter-argument to this is ... <snip> "counter-argument" Heh, heh, well said. :) -s XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Unicode and XSL (was substring(, James Clark | Thread | RE: Unicode and XSL (was substring(, Kay Michael |
newbie xsl:if, James Kerr | Date | Re: Unicode and XSL (was substring(, James Clark |
Month |