Subject: Re: understanding trees From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:36:23 +0100 |
Andre Halama wrote: > > thanks for all your responses, they helped clear up a lot of my problems. > > the one thing i couldn't get straight yet is one of the question that is > also in the spec (6.1.1): > 'Is the parent of an attribute node the element that the attribute is on?' This question is raised in the context of the various axes. I read it to mean: 'should the "parent" axis of an attribute node include the containing node' (rather than, I imagine, being null) 'despite the the fact the the attribute node is not on the "children" axis of the containing node?' (since attribute nodes only appear on the "attribute" axis). I don't think it means anything more complicated than that, despite my initial reaction of "so which element is its parent then?" <snip!> > > hope this discussion isn't too annoying, > Not at all - educational for me, at least. Francis. -- Francis Norton. Air Rage - a "flight *and* fight" reaction? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: understanding trees, Andre Halama | Thread | RE: understanding trees, Tony Graham |
Re: apply-templates select question, James Tauber | Date | Karey's Introduction to the group, KAREN_LEICHEL |
Month |