Subject: Re: XSLT vs JSP From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 11:22:50 +0800 |
I wrote: > > I am concerned at JSPs (and ASPs before them) breaking XML well- > > formedness with the delimiters <% and %> Scott Ferguson wrote: > That's a silly thing to worry about, like saying that Lisp is better than C > because it uses '(' instead of '{', or that CSS is bad solely because it > doesn't use '<'. Besides, JSP 1.0 has an XML encoding. I don't think it's silly at all and nothing like the analogies you give. My concern was that JSPs go 95% of the way towards being XML (with the benefits that brings) and then ruin any chance of that by using their own non-XML syntax extension. But if JSP has an XML encoding (of which I was not aware) then it makes me feel much better about it. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSLT vs JSP, Scott Ferguson | Thread | RE: XSLT vs JSP, Don Park |
Re: XSLT vs JSP, Scott Ferguson | Date | Re: XSLT vs JSP, Paul Prescod |
Month |