Subject: Re: XSL-WG solicits comments on FO Draft From: Rick Geimer <rick.geimer@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 09:43:34 -0700 |
As I mentioned on this list before, it would be nice to mention that the DTD for XSL-FO is an SGML DTD, not an XML DTD. Rick Geimer National Semiconductor rick.geimer@xxxxxxx Stephen Deach wrote: > The XSL working group is soliciting comments from the xsl-list to improve > the readability and understandability of formatting object and property > descriptions in the April draft ( http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-xsl-19990421 ). > > We are seeking comments on the wording and organization of the document, > locations where a diagram or example is necessary or would be extremely > helpful, and any missing or incomplete descriptions, ambiguities, vagueness, > apparent contradictions, and any other *concrete* issues. > > In short, we are seeking suggestions that would improve the usefulness of > the document. > > Please respond within the next 2 weeks to "RE: XSL-WG solicits comments on > FO Draft" on "xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx". > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------- > Stephen Deach | Sr Computer Scientist > 408-536-6521 (office) | Adobe Systems Inc. > 408-537-4214 (fax) | Mail Stop E15-420 > sdeach@xxxxxxxxx | 345 Park Ave > | San Jose, CA 95110-2704 > | USA > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------- > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Who uses XSLT?, Rick Geimer | Thread | Re: XSL-WG solicits comments on FO , Stephen Deach |
Re: AW: XSL Tools, Toivo Lainevool | Date | Re: XML and XSL server-side parsers, Rick Geimer |
Month |