Re: AW: XSL Tools

Subject: Re: AW: XSL Tools
From: Toivo Lainevool <tlainevool@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 09:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
--- john.markor@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> This bring up an interesting point.  Is there an advantage to saving the HTML file and
> delivering a static version to a browser rather than a dynamic version delivered on the fly
> using XSL and, say IE5 (just for an example.)
> 
> I've always been under the impressiion that the dynamic delivery is preferable from a management
> standpoint - could I be wrong here?

I can think of two reason too have static pages 
1) speed, static pages are delivered faster than generated pages
2) bot searches - some search engine bots won't find generated pages, if you want the pages to be
listed in search engines it's best to have them static

Toivo Lainevool

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread