Subject: XML Search Engine Upgrade From: Duane Nickull <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 08:59:19 -0700 |
Hello all: We have received lots of response during the last 4 days and have upgraded the User interface and provided a demonstration of our <XML> Search Engine's Capabilities. The Demonstration is at: http://www.goxml.com/help_srch.xsp With respect to the question of validating XML, - yes, our Search Vehicle's Spider module does determine whether or not the XML is valid and will reject *MOST* invalid XML. It does not reject XML that is invalid due to case sensetivity problems. This is becuase we designed the Spider to convert all elements to uppercase. It will reject XML documents that have nesting problems, mismatched tags, improper structure (does not currently read external DTD's) etc. We have been asked by many people to propose standard tags for marking up key data so it can be found. I would like to hear more opinions on this before any action is taken. Specifically, we do not wish to limit authors to only using certain tags. We do however, wish to suggest that authors use tags that are descriptive in nature. In response to the *.XSP filename extensions, YES - we have finished our eXensible Object Server Pages module and the entire site at www.goxml.xom isi using it. It is still in Beta. There will be a preview release of this module within 12 weeks to the industry. Duane Nickull http://www.goxml.com/index.xsp I XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Possible whitespace problem wit, John E. Simpson | Thread | Re: XML Search Engine Upgrade, XSL-List Owner |
Re: Possible whitespace problem wit, James Clark | Date | Re: Possible whitespace problem wit, John E. Simpson |
Month |