Subject: Re: Someone bashing XSL From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 15:58:58 +0100 (BST) |
Simon St.Laurent writes: > > And maybe some competition, taken seriously, could improve XSL... > good lord, we have had 15 years of "competition to XSL", in the shape of all the SGML processing systems over the years, and the entire development of DSSSL. what more do you want? XSL is a pretty modest effort at standardizing the best of the last decade into an 80/20 solution. It isn't a big new product trying to bulldoze competitors aside, with hordes of screaming brain-washed acolytes. why do you (and Leventhal, I suppose) portray XSL as the product of a sinister inner circle bent on influencing world history, like something from the plot of a james bond film? hey, I've got an idea? why dont we backtrack 6 months and restart the frenzied argument about the politics of W3C and XSL? Lets have another round of "whats wrong with CSS and DOM" - what joy! sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Someone bashing XSL, Simon St.Laurent | Thread | Re: Someone bashing XSL, Simon St.Laurent |
Re: Includes through XSL, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: Someone bashing XSL, Simon St.Laurent |
Month |