Subject: Re: Someone bashing XSL From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 13:25:49 +0800 |
> >Michael's quote aside, I actually object to Decisionsoft's misrepresentation > >of XSL on that page (http://www.xmlscript.org/xsl.html) (and of DSSSL). > > > >Oh well :-) > > I hate to continue this mire, but really have to wonder what you're all so > upset about. It just annoyed me that Decisionsoft doesn't seem to know much about XSL. Their examples are incorrect or misleading and they make comments like DSSSL being "completely unusable" when this is blatantly untrue. > The white paper isn't spectacular, nor is the page, but I > sincerely hope the folks at xmlscript.org didn't knuckle under to a group > of screaming XSL partisans. Their XML-based scripting language takes a > very different approach from that of XSL, and highlighting the differences > seems reasonable. But their arguments are straw man. The XSL they are highlighting differences between doesn't exist. *That* is my problem. But as the smiley in my previous post suggests, I'm not taking this particularly seriously. Decisionsoft aren't competing with anything I do, so I don't really care. Like Didier, I got a bit of a laugh. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: href and template, Dan Machak | Thread | RE: Someone bashing XSL, Linda van den Brink |
Re: Weird IE5 behaviour, Matthew MacKenzie | Date | pre-formatted text in FO terminolog, Michel Goossens |
Month |