Subject: Re: document() function From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 20:43:53 +0100 (BST) |
Michael Klein writes: > > Are there any XSL processors which implement the document() > function? Saxon and XSL:P do, I think > If not, are there any workarounds? I would like to keep common > resources in separate XML files, and allow authors to optionally include > parts of those files in their own XML documents and display these parts > in-line in the generated HTML. are your common resources to be complete XML documents, thats the question. if not, then straightforward traditional SGML entity references? <!ENTITY chap1 SYSTEM "chap1.xml"> ... &chap1; ?? sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
document() function, Michael Klein | Thread | Re: document() function, Keith Visco |
Re: Someone bashing XSL, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: document() function, Keith Visco |
Month |