Subject: Re: Someone bashing XSL From: Marcus Carr <mrc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 08:14:33 +1000 |
Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > > It might translate to "extremely reliable large scale transformation of > > documents", which sounds like a good thing, minus buzzwords. > > an excellent thing. perhaps then what is missing is the reasoned > argument by the "experienced" engineers about why XSL misses the cut, > but xmlscript makes the grade Nor have we seen the obverse case made, at least not by way of this thread. There's been a lot of mud-slinging and precious little substance - hardly the handiwork of "experienced" engineers. -- Regards, Marcus Carr email: mrc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ___________________________________________________________________ Allette Systems (Australia) www: http://www.allette.com.au ___________________________________________________________________ "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Someone bashing XSL, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: Someone bashing XSL, Ray Cromwell |
Re: generalized template to transfo, Honglin Su | Date | Re: Someone bashing XSL, Ray Cromwell |
Month |