Subject: Re: msxml (was: RE: Includes through XSL) From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 09:34:55 +0000 (GMT) |
Shalperin writes: > > oh dang you just shot yourself in the foot. go straight to jail, do I *was* joking, you know... > Okaaaaaay... that being said (and I don't disagree with you), what > *C++* parser implementation do you recommend? Keep in mind, it > must support XSL(T). you have me at a disadvantage here, because I cannot see why you care what language something is written in. I can see why you might dislike Java, but if I offered you one written in Fortran, is that OK? unless I mistake, there are no C++ implementations of an XSL engine conforming to the current draft. Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
msxml (was: RE: Includes through XS, Shalperin | Thread | RE: msxml (was: RE: Includes throug, Shalperin |
Re: how do I print a variable?, David Carlisle | Date | RE: Parsers for Apache, Marco . Mistroni |
Month |